Friday, June 26, 2015

June Water Consumption

 
BAY STREET
AKHMAHKSIS
01-June 
310,599167,705
02- June 
271,435 
03- June 
314,23017,420
04- June 
311,63461,457
05- June 
276,41361,296
06- June 
254,929 
07- June 
254,929 
08- June 
317,980214,206
09- June 
281,450117,765
10- June 
225,570158,254
11-June
297,4979,114
12-June
370,423204,627
13-June
247,999198,699
14-June
210,12099,803
15-June
292,509150,091
16-June
264,098113,894
17-June
291,25578,720
18-June
221,14187,744
19-June
255,617146,249
20-June
198,79972,162
21-June
249,457148,041
22-June
297,499124,593
23-June
260,760152,995
24-June
173,147171,648
25-June
  
26-June
  
27-June
  
28-June
  
29-June
  
30-June
  

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

When the is no reading on the AKHMAHKSIS column, does that mean no output? Also, I haven't followed the numbers like you have but are these comparable to historical numbers? Are the water restrictions having any real affect on the consumption?

Anonymous said...

It is interesting to try and figure out how the district is going to make up the revenue shortfall with the lowering of the rates for everyone other than residential. I think the readers know the answer to that question.
The Wick Inn for one example if it uses the same amount of water this year as it did last year will have a reduction in their water usage bill of $10,829.05. That is not much incentive for them to conserve water this coming summer.
Other big users may have similar savings.

Anonymous said...

the question is why?

Anonymous said...

if this is the way we are going to be treated by our own employees maybe its time theres a pushback against this type of give-away to resorts who have already ridden on our backs with exorbitantly low water meter meter readings in the last few years.

Anonymous said...

Well there were a few citizens who made comments on the water rates but a lot more of the resorts present at the meetings ensuring that their desires were met.

Where were you when you were given the opportunity to speak? Were you working and could not go? Did you write a letter of complaint? Oh you didn't bother because you knew you were going to be ignored?

Some democracy here where council hires a consultant instead of thinking for themselves. I wonder if resorts consulted or whined or dined with him while he was in Tofino? Where did he stay?
Shouldn't that be on the public record?