I do not normally write on blogs. I believe in open communication with all
levels of government. I am not a bully and I despise bullying. I am not posting
anonymously.
I am frustrated by Council's recent actions and lack of
communication / consultation with the community. I have to speak out on this
issue. I respect everyone who runs for municipal office, whether they are
successfully elected or not. I respect those who get elected and serve their
community, whether I voted for them or not. Theirs' is a challenging and time
consuming job. The right decisions are not always made. Admitting your mistake
and reversing decisions is sometimes just the right thing to do.
I am
struggling to understand the recent decision to downgrade Parks and Recreation
and fire the Director. Parks and Recreation is the one program within our
village that is truly for the citizens of Tofino, helping to make the community
a healthy and enjoyable place to live at a time when everything seems to be
directed exclusively at tourism. I recall only one member of Council speaking of
downgrading or getting rid of Parks and Recreation during the election campaign,
with most Councillors and the Mayor speaking of support for Parks and Recreation
during the all-candidates meeting. Some of this discussion centered on
attracting and maintaining young families in the community.
Now, less
than a year into their term, with both the Mayor and the CAO leaving, Council
has made this decision (without community input or consultation) that will
impact our Parks and Recreation program and every person who lives in this
community. You can describe it anyway that you like, but firing Sally Mole after
20 years of service (losing that local knowledge and experience) and moving the
program into another department is a degradation of the Parks and Recreation
service that will impact the people of Tofino over the coming years long after
this Council is gone.
I have read the only item of communication from
Council on this issue in the past week, a wordsmithed bureaucratic propaganda
"press release". The release only raises more questions. It attempts to portray
the changes as merely an organizational change, rather than the service impacts.
Buried in here is combining Parks and Recreation with "Resort Services" (which I
can only guess is more tourist services). I note that Parks and Recreation is
not even mentioned in their "strategic objectives". I have sent an e-mail of my
concerns to each member of Council, but so far, have not received even one
acknowledgement. "Open and transparent communication with the citizens of
Tofino" is included within the strategic objectives, but it is not clear to me
when this strategic objective will be put into practice.
This is a
fundamental change in the way Tofino will do business and in the services that
will be provided under the umbrella of the Parks and Recreation program. Council
may think that they have a mandate to downgrade Parks and Recreation, but they
do not have a ethical mandate without first going to the citizens of Tofino.
good comment
ReplyDeleteVery well spoken and this is exactly how I feel too.
ReplyDeleteWhere was the public consultation?
anyone know how josie feels about this debacle?
ReplyDeleteShould we be afraid or very afraid?
If any of these councillors run again and state the words public consultation or transparency, I will laugh. To completely re-organize and demote Parks and Rec without any consultation is clearly a huge blunder.
ReplyDeleteIt's my impression that she's a bit mum on the subject. I'm not sure that someone who wants to be the future mayor should not have an opinion on this. Not knowing where she stands on issues doesn't make it easy to vote.
ReplyDelete5:20, Huge blunder? MEGA BLUNDER!!!
ReplyDeleteThe poll at the top of the page pretty much shows how Tofino feels about sally and her dept. 51 to 21 in her favour. Not surprising. Excellent comments Brian!
ReplyDeleteAdmit your mistake and give Sally her job back! Great comments!
ReplyDeleteI have never worked somewhere that there was "public consultation" regarding letting an employee go. While I am sure that Sally is a lovely person and is obviously well liked by the community; we as voters chose this council to represent us. They would not likely make such a drastic change if there wasn't cause for dismissal. I would like to assume that council has information that we as the public are not privy to for various reasons. That info likely helped them come to the decision they made to eliminate Sally's position You don't let someone go without cause as there would be legal ramifications to consider. There was a re-organization of the district. If Sally was dismissed without cause then she should be able to sue the district. Has anyone noticed that Sally herself has not been heard from in this matter? She would have been told why she was being let go.......ask her why she was let go. Maybe she got a severance package?As for Sally running for mayor comments, she lives in Ucluelet so that is not an option besides there are a couple decent candidates already.
ReplyDeletewe chose this council to represent us.they are not.they got their "information" from the cao.consider the source.
ReplyDeleteIf you people would show up at Council meetings you might know something.All you do is complain.
ReplyDeleteSally could actualy run for mayor even though she lives in ukee. Remember the day when Dan Haley was on council. He lived in Courteney or Comox. Even if she couldn't she could be CAO.
ReplyDeleteI don't want to but have to agree with 6:05s' comments. There is so much complexity to such a situation. There is so much that we do not know. Whether the new department will put parcs and rec on the back burner or whether it is a department that will be able to attract more funds to be used on similar programs? I still do not understand why a different position could not have been created for Sally under the unbrella of the new department? There is obviously a lot we do not know.
ReplyDeleteI would also like to say that absolutely all the councillors elected were status quo candidates. There should be no surprise that municipal governance does not seem to have changed. All the members were above the age of 40. Which is not necessarily a bad thing. However, there did not seem to be a single progressive bone in any of them. Either these people were retired or long-term business owners. This is a representation of tofino from the past. Of course there are some exceptions. However nobody comes of as a visionary. This was a conservative slate, with conservative policies.
Dear 6:21 I'm quite sure us people will show up at the next council meeting! Us people are very angry! Us people won't stand for this crap any longer! Us people look after those that look after us people! If those people (council) actualy knew something about what us people like and want this never would have happened!!
ReplyDeleteAnonymous 605
ReplyDeleteI do not debate issues with Anonymous posters. However, I have not heard of anyone saying there should be consultation regarding letting anyone go. There should be consultation on the fundamental changes to the Parks and Recreation Program.
6:29 There's nothing complex about it.Tofino is still a small town with a handful of employees.Some half-wits would have you believe it needs to be managed like New York City.All the town needs is some common sense and a council that stays in touch with there neighbors.
ReplyDeleteUcluelet isn't cutting their recreation department but they don't hire as many consultants.
ReplyDeleteThere is speculation that the DOT is going to cut the parks and rec program down to 6 months a year. Families live in Tofino 12 months a year. You do the math.
ReplyDeleteExcellent letter and commentary Brian. I agree completely with everything you said. Thank you for writing it.
ReplyDeleteRegards, Zoë.
In response to 6:05, you see! that is just the problem...without transparency, we are left to 'assume' there is something Sally has done to deserve to be fired because, as you say, "They would not likely make such a drastic change if there was not cause for dismissal". Well, challenge this assumption immediately because it is a false one. And yes, "We as voters chose this council to represent us", so let's review each and every councillor's promises during their campaign... did anyone stand on a platform of eliminating Parks 'n Rec? Not in my memory.
ReplyDeleteGreat letter!
ReplyDeleteWhat transparency? This whole fiasco was thought up and executed behind closed doors in camera. The definition of transparency is operating in such a way that it is easy for others to see what actions are performed. I understand that employee issues are dealt with in camera but not this type of organizational change. Why was the public not consulted? Why was this information not at the OCP/Parks and Rec Master Plan community input? Why did they write a barren press release with no information about what this change will mean to the community? And why did they leave Sally until page two and give her two sentences after 20 years of amazing service? And how did being transparent become an objective in a strategic plan? At the all candidates meeting all these people all stood up in front of the town and said they were committed to transparency and open communication. When we will start to get this promise? I am tired of District of Tofino leadership always keeping the residents in the dark. Yes we voted for you to carry out policy and direction but you need to consult with the tax payers before you cut up the parks and rec program.
ReplyDeletePlease re-visit this issue and realize that you have made a huge mistake.
If Harper and Mackay can reconsider the F35 deal surely Tofino council can take a second look at this decision.
ReplyDeleteEven Egyptian President Morsi has offered concessions.
ReplyDeleteWhy did Councillor McMaster claim 6 full days of pay for UBCM when the convention is only 4 days and the dates he wrote down are September 23 to 28, or 5 days.
ReplyDeletehttps://tofino.civicweb.net/Documents/DocumentDisplay.aspx?Id=13375
Re:7:46PM
ReplyDeleteUBCM = 4
Workshop = 1
Travel to/from (tofino-victoria)=I
TOTAL = 6 days
September 23,24,25, 26,27,28 = 6 days
Hope that is simple enough arithmetic for you!
Duncan McMaster
Thank you for your comment
ReplyDeleteDecember 08-4:51pm
ReplyDeleteExactly. Good comments.
On the DOT website under "How to Participate" there are a few options. Among them is the option to submit a petition. How about a FORMAL PETITION to Council with as many signatures as we can get to let council know officially that we are opposed to the changes to Parks and Recreation. Could that make a difference or am I being naive?
ReplyDeleteI think anything makes a difference! Lets start a petition and make sure we all attend the council meeting on Tuesday at 5:30 pm to address our concerns. Bring kids!
ReplyDeleteYes, let's bring our kids! Sally was always there for the kids! And loved by our kids. Kids and families in our town are most affected by this decision by council. Kids in this town were always her focus.
ReplyDeleteI work till 6, but I will be there right after I get off work.
ReplyDeleteHey didn't Sally have good long standing personal relationships with a few of the councillors? What changed that?
ReplyDeleteThank you for your letter Brian ..clearly many of us applaud your thoughts.
ReplyDeleteI too wonder why the "parks & rec. dept. reorganization" was not a focal point of the OCP/Parks and Rec. master plan?? the presentation was "all about consultation".
Personally I am embarrassed by our elected representatives...the timing and execution did not exemplify the compassion that I hoped our town would demonstrate.
Toby
Petition for Sally! I'll sign..
ReplyDeleteWill Council "listen to the people" like they all said they would at the all candidates meeting. Anyone want to bring along one of their brochures that said "I want to work for you" Bring Sally Back !
ReplyDeleteCould we please start a petition to reinstate Sally that we all can sign on line?
ReplyDeleteOnly in Tofino you say!!!
ReplyDelete